Homer wrote:It does seem that the seedings are somewhat random and, dare I say it, just a little Scots-biased?!
Seeding are based on the rankings list, which is essentially an attendance prize rather than a reflection of ability*. Scots are always more highly rated in the year after the 6-day than the year before, simply because its easier for us to get to enough races.
It will get a little better if the Event Review goes through as proposed (though worse under some proposed scenarios).
Graeme (not seeded)
* In the process of building the list, a better reflection of ability *is* calculated for those who don't do enough races of the right age and length and status - check Appendix K if you really care...