distracted wrote:Also noticed that the sprint/relay maps were printed differently to the "individual" day maps - it seemed to be that the offset printed maps used for Days 2 & 3 were more legible, and printed on different paper to the laser printed sprint/relay. Maybe the increased readability was just because the sprint/relay maps weren't almost all white.
Before anyone gets confused I should point out that sprint course 1 had laser-printed maps and all other sprint courses had offset printed maps. We had a problem with overprint alignment for course 1, and this was the only way around it.
Nobody has yet commented on the 1:3,000 sprint maps for the senior courses. At a site meeting the Organiser commented to me that the 1:4,000 map was quite difficult to read. The ISSOM specification uses quite small symbols and line thicknesses, which are roughly equivalent to 1:15,000 for ISOM maps. It therefore seemed reasonable to enlarge the map and symbols to 1:3,000, exactly equivalent in concept to producing a 1:10,000 map from a 1:15,000 map.
Did people appreciate being able to see the detail, were they annoyed by how difficult it was to fold, or did they not even notice? Should we do it again next year?