Emit at the JK
Moderators: [nope] cartel, team nopesport
But think of the possibilities with the v3 e-card, for example massed non-contact punching (excuse the oxymoron!) at the first control on the relays, non-punching e-line finish. I hope the JK organisers are going to exploit the benefits of the system.
- Steve
- orange
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 10:57 am
- Location: Herts/Bucks badlands
Mrs H. wrote: I didn't see it until I had got through to the internet entry form - which I promptly stopped filling in and started sending an e-mail to Santa to ask him to put some e-cards on the present list![]()
I guess coming from the equatorial desert midway between the EMIT poles, with only 3 EMIT race experiences in 10 years, I'd be better leaving Santa's elves to more worthwhile employment.
- seabird
- diehard
- Posts: 659
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:20 am
- Location: Bradford
distracted wrote:It's the same things that come up time and time again - and mainly boils down to people don't like using EMIT because they're [b]unfamiliar
Of course all this debate would be solved if someone came up with a system which incorporated the best of both worlds
RFID chip surgical implants. Job done
- tim sleepless
- orange
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 8:54 pm
- Location: Toronto
Nails wrote:Yep I was right pissed off a 3km run to the start and no spare brikkes....
Good point, I ran at a race in sweden, went for a forest dump on my warm up and left my SI card when i picked up my compass and description holder. fortunately they had lots of spares at the start... just incase.
-
mharky - team nopesport
- Posts: 4541
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 3:39 pm
Ihate emit
The latest version ones don't have a back-up card and if you pass too close to a control that's not yours, it registers so the numbers are all to hell. Now having second thoughts about enterng as it's expensive enough without added hire costs.

- RS
- brown
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 5:47 pm
RS wrote:IThe latest version ones don't have a back-up card
No emit brick has a back-up card. But all versions have the pin-bed and clips on them, you have to get the back-up card from the organiser. For the JK they MUST them, probably get them with your entries and it'll have your start time on n stuff.
If an organiser doesn't provide back up cards and you mis-punch then they either have to re-instate you or void the whole course because they didn't give out the back-ups.
[qoute="RS"]f you pass too close to a control that's not yours, it registers so the numbers are all to hell[/qoute]
Do you mean, if you punch another control?
-
mharky - team nopesport
- Posts: 4541
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 3:39 pm
A massive case of deja vu - I remember having long discussions with fellow LEI members 6-7 years ago about the merits of the two systems - I was weaned on SI and argued in favour of it long and hard. Then moved to GRAMP where we've used emit for most events for 3-4 yrs. As a planner I'm completely converted - so much easier to set up, especially for small events. As a competitor the latest version brikkes are superb - you only need to be a few inches from the base plate for it to register. All you need to do is look at the LED as you wave the brikke over it and then, if you want to double check, glance at the display as you run away from the control. I've done this at every event for the last year and the control has registered every time.
The problem of costly brikkes is a tricky one - I keep suggesting our club issues one to each regular orienteer, that way we could have a database with all personal info on it making entries much easier. Friends in Norway use this apporach but I guess they have the benefit of having a 'can do, keep it simple' approach and getting sponsors to pay for the brikkes...
The problem of costly brikkes is a tricky one - I keep suggesting our club issues one to each regular orienteer, that way we could have a database with all personal info on it making entries much easier. Friends in Norway use this apporach but I guess they have the benefit of having a 'can do, keep it simple' approach and getting sponsors to pay for the brikkes...
Don't miss the Deeside Double - 13 October Aberdeen Uni Sprint Race and 14 October Cambus o'May Long-O. See www,grampoc.com for details
- PeteL
- white
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 5:22 pm
- Location: MISPWOSO
RS wrote:No you don't need to punch, just passing by pretty closely does it!
true with the contact free, still why do you need the emit screen to remind you which control you're going to? you don't have one with SI do you

and it seems to be a quid hire for the weekend, so not expensive at all...
-
distracted - addict
- Posts: 1195
- Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2004 12:15 am
Was just going to post to say that the emit hire was cheap at £1 (I take it for all 3 days) but I'd love to know how the individual entries cost is worked out - £12.50 seems rather steep (and yes, I know BOC is £13 but Scottish 6 days is £10). If you are running the golden oldies classes you may as well run colour-code - longer courses and cheaper 

- RS
- brown
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 5:47 pm
If only we had one system.
After many events, still trying to get the hang of emit. Fiddly or what.
Dont trust the proximity punching.
Only used the things once south of the border - that was at the JK relay area. Will give it a miss again this year, a bit expensive, blow it on the 6 days instead.
After many events, still trying to get the hang of emit. Fiddly or what.
Dont trust the proximity punching.
Only used the things once south of the border - that was at the JK relay area. Will give it a miss again this year, a bit expensive, blow it on the 6 days instead.
----
Excuse me, can you tell me where I am?
Excuse me, can you tell me where I am?
-
ryeland of doom - blue
- Posts: 448
- Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2004 11:34 am
- Location: Cockenzie
SI Forever
There should be one standard electronic system for the Uk at least if not worldwide...
and it should be Sport Ident (SI)
I have decided not to go to some events because they are using Emit - I just hate it - and hadnt realised until now that the JK was using it... have to decide now whether to bother going. The Forest of Dean isn't that great an area anyway... and has been used for many large events over the last 5 years..... including a fairly recent JK.
SI Forever
and it should be Sport Ident (SI)
I have decided not to go to some events because they are using Emit - I just hate it - and hadnt realised until now that the JK was using it... have to decide now whether to bother going. The Forest of Dean isn't that great an area anyway... and has been used for many large events over the last 5 years..... including a fairly recent JK.
SI Forever
- LostOldTimer
- red
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 5:42 pm
- Location: Lost
There's seems to be a bit of confusion here between the two "types" of Emit punching
The old style stakes with units on the top, the cards have to make physical contact with the unit in the usual way to guarantee a punch - this also gives you the card backup mark.
The new style contact-free controls, as used at Oxford (which look like the control in this picture require the competitor to get within range of the transmitter and the card is seen to have registered by looking at the LC display, so needs the v3 cards. There's no backup as usual, if backups are required it's the standard pin-punch method
You can with the former risk things and wave the card over the top of the unit hoping it registers but by doing this you stand a very high chance of being disqualified, especially with one of the older cards...
The old style stakes with units on the top, the cards have to make physical contact with the unit in the usual way to guarantee a punch - this also gives you the card backup mark.
The new style contact-free controls, as used at Oxford (which look like the control in this picture require the competitor to get within range of the transmitter and the card is seen to have registered by looking at the LC display, so needs the v3 cards. There's no backup as usual, if backups are required it's the standard pin-punch method
You can with the former risk things and wave the card over the top of the unit hoping it registers but by doing this you stand a very high chance of being disqualified, especially with one of the older cards...
-
distracted - addict
- Posts: 1195
- Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2004 12:15 am
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 7 guests