Nopesport

by **lilywhite** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 1:10 pm

I have to say that Kula Shaker were a complete and utter pile of steaming wank.

by **Patrick** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 1:11 pm

samsonite wrote:90s "britrock" - manic street preachers. ultrasound. catatonia (onl the first album). elastica. (first album again). teenage fanclub. new order had some stuff in the 90s. blur. oasis first album. nothing else by them at all. inspiral carpets. 3 colours red, first album, first half. geneva for the deen connection. pretty much anything on creation records from the early nineties, but especially loveless by my bloody valentine....
and then a whole bunch of more obscure stuff that i wont go into.

How on earth do you remember all this stuff? You can only have been about 4 at the time! You're doing a good job of taking me back to my long-lost youth though.

Isn't Anything was way better than Loveless though (it was before 1990, however).

Has anyone mentioned the Jesus & Mary Chain yet?

Patrick

by **Mr. Furness** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 1:12 pm

harsh. what about hush? thats a deep purple track and they are kings of rock. you'll be grateful when you're dead was well rockin. sweet.

by **Kitch** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 1:13 pm

Hopper - album, English and French - search it out

by **samsonite** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 1:15 pm

i can remember it cos i was 4 times at least 3 at the time and im a proper music fascist.

loveless conquers all.

kula shaker were bloody awful yes.

gomez 3rd album was awfully boring.

as for the jesus and mary chain, i thought about it, but im pretty ure all their good stuff came out pre 1990. if im wrong then add psychocandy to the list.

by **Becks** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 1:16 pm

Yu can't be the music fascist! That's my job! If only I wasn't being closely monitored at work I'd join in with this discussion! Grr...just wait till I get home...

by **Mr. Furness** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 1:20 pm

ok so everyone hates kula shaker i'' just go and sit in a corner and get over it.

gomez third album- do you mean in our gun, cause thats the forth. you may already know, and i may be wrong (does that make sense? -ah who cares) but i'm working on the first three being, bring it on, liquid skin, and abandoned shopping trolly hotline.

by **Patrick** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 1:24 pm

samsonite wrote:as for the jesus and mary chain, i thought about it, but im pretty ure all their good stuff came out pre 1990. if im wrong then add psychocandy to the list.

Psychocandy was mid-80s, but the 3rd and 4th albums were 1990s and were still pretty good. I remember seeing them at the SECC around 1991, supported by Blur (crap), MBV (great) and Dinosaur Jr (not bad) and they were definitely the best of the lot.

What abuot Underworld? Too dance-y?

Patrick

by **Kitch** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 1:24 pm

Carter played the Queen's Hall
We had to go outside cos someone called the fire brigade, after sseing smoke curling out the top of the clock tower.
'cept it wasn't smoke it was our steaming sweat - ripping !

by Ed » Fri Sep 10, 2004 1:31 pm

Patrick wrote:What abuot Underworld? Too dance-y?

Patrick

the title was "brit rock"... underworld would be stretching it. you'ld also then have to include chemical brothers, leftfield, etc.

by **samsonite** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 1:34 pm

right

i havent heard the later JAMC albums but i shall go and buy them tonight

in our gun was the third album by gomez. shopping trolley... was compilation of stuff like b sides and rareties. and in our gun is rubbish.

kitch i think i love you. english and french is a frickin amazin album.

i am the music fascist and i always will be. not you becks. im sorry, you can be my understudy if you want.

and dont get me started on the monstrosity of deep purple.

kula shaker seemed to be promising when they were all sharp suits and grateful when your dead. then the indian jobby came in and it fell apart.

by **Mr. Furness** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 1:47 pm

ok smasonite, i agree in our gun was slightly poo, i intended abandoned shoppoing trolly as third album just cause thats the order they came out in. and i agree kula shaker did go bad, but for one song on a cmpilation cd, i think it coud work.

i am still aspiring to be becks' understudy, so i agree that you are the ultimate music fascist.

by **Becks** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:11 pm

I'm not impressed on this claim of overal music fascism! Ask any of the lot on my tour, I can get pretty good....especially when it comes to Keane. In fact, my first words to my boyfriend were "Pearl Jam?! For crying out loud."

How would one start a music fascism duel I wonder?

by **rob f** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:20 pm

Yeah agrees with becks her music taste is great
i have one other thing to say

ASH

by **samsonite** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:28 pm

ash ares till a good live band its just a shame that everything since a life less ordinary has been pish!

a music duel sounds fun. i will win though.

and im not sure that pearl jam are too bad, they have a couple of really amazin songs in amongst the tedium, especially off ten and versus

Nopesport

The UK Online Orienteering Community

Brit rock

Who is online

Recent Stories