Gross wrote:Methinks Daddy should've read the rules & information in the car park & made certain said small child was prepared properly![]()
Deuteronomy 24:16 applies.
Moderators: [nope] cartel, team nopesport
Gross wrote:Methinks Daddy should've read the rules & information in the car park & made certain said small child was prepared properly![]()
graeme wrote:Deuteronomy 24:16 applies.
Gnitworp wrote:graeme wrote:Deuteronomy 24:16 applies.
Just looked it up - bit draconian for forgetting your whistle!
King Penguin wrote:The point is not whether the injured party carrying a **** would help in all circumstances, it is whether it MAY help in SOME circumstances.
Meat Market wrote: Then the newspaper/TV cant...
Daily Drivel wrote: "These people seem to believe mobile communication hasn't shifted since the 17th century. This paper map and anorak brigade still believe a 50p plastic whistle is the last word in safety! News just in for these so-called "orienteers", the 21st century has sat nav, GPS and mobile phones ".
Daily Rant wrote: "These technophobes hold competitions where they choose a plastic whistle worth a few pence as best for ensuring safety of their paying participants, even in this day and age.
It is not that they haven't heard of new-fangled things like GPS-enabled mobile phones, it is much worse than that....even for their top competitions, so called 'world ranking events', such everyday devices are explicitly outlawed.
That's right, you must carry a whistle for safety, but if you are caught carrying your iPhone you will be disqualified.
Chalk one up for the blazer brigade, muddled thinking and the nanny state over modernity, common sense and personal responsibility.".
King Penguin wrote:Many years ago when seatbelts first became mandatory there were lots of comments about "big brother", reluctance and it felt odd. Now it's an automatic action to belt up.
Granted, the stats on lives saved / injuries reduced by seatbelts are unequivocal.
graeme wrote:Daily Rant wrote: "These technophobes hold competitions where they choose a plastic whistle worth a few pence as best for ensuring safety of their paying participants, even in this day and age.
It is not that they haven't heard of new-fangled things like GPS-enabled mobile phones, it is much worse than that....even for their top competitions, so called 'world ranking events', such everyday devices are explicitly outlawed.
That's right, you must carry a whistle for safety, but if you are caught carrying your iPhone you will be disqualified.
Chalk one up for the blazer brigade, muddled thinking and the nanny state over modernity, common sense and personal responsibility.".
Meat Market wrote:Like most folk on here I've figured out in the past that me shouting for help is more likely to get through than the sound of my whistle.
Meat Market wrote:If the worst happened and someone had a heart attack in the forest and died, I would like the organiser to be able to say to the local/national press: "well we put all sorts of precautions in place, like for example the competitors carry whistles if they get into trouble".
JK wrote:It's the same with the TdF though, those descents are terriblly fast and steep. In this modern age of disk brakes and fat wheel can you believe that they are banned from using bikes like a Honda Goldwing.
JK wrote:that may depend on whether they can locate where you have secreted yours of course
graeme wrote:JK wrote:It's the same with the TdF though, those descents are terriblly fast and steep. In this modern age of disk brakes and fat wheel can you believe that they are banned from using bikes like a Honda Goldwing.
Not well supported by evidence, as you should know
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests