Question for the assembled brainpower
At Southern NIghts this coming Saturday M21 and M35 are on the same course. Some good M35s have entered M21, and so there is a sporting chance that an M35 who entered M21 will record a faster time that the fastest person entered as M35.
If that were to happen, who should get the M35 trophy?
the fastest entry in that class?
or the fastest M35?
Prize eligibilty
Moderators: [nope] cartel, team nopesport
73 posts
• Page 1 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Re: Prize eligibilty
It depends on whether you're holding an orienteering contest or a form filling-in contest.
Coming soon
Boston City Race (May, maybe not)
Coasts and Islands (Shetland)
SprintScotland https://sprintscotland.weebly.com/
Boston City Race (May, maybe not)
Coasts and Islands (Shetland)
SprintScotland https://sprintscotland.weebly.com/
-
graeme - god
- Posts: 4744
- Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 6:04 pm
- Location: struggling with an pɹɐɔ ʇıɯǝ
Re: Prize eligibilty
The Loofa wrote:If that were to happen, who should get the M35 trophy?
the fastest entry in that class?
or the fastest M35?
The fastest person who entered the M35 class. Who could be an M40 (looking at the entries).
Simon Firth - ESOC
Comments on Nopesport are my own
Comments on Nopesport are my own
- smf
- green
- Posts: 326
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 11:42 am
- Location: Edinburgh
Re: Prize eligibilty
The general principle is that a runner is only eligible in the class that they entered. There are good reasons for that which many people do not agree with, and have been discussed on here so many times before. If you, as the organising club, wish to change that principle then you can (there is no specific competition rule for the SNC). If you do though, this should be made very clear in the final details, even to the extent of letting people change course if required.
- NeilC
- addict
- Posts: 1348
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 9:03 am
- Location: SE
Re: Prize eligibilty
You could add a control to the M21 course to avoid having to think about it.
- Arnold
- diehard
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:24 am
Re: Prize eligibilty
This does raise the question of whether or not the M35 class should exist at all. Personally I don't think it should. But maybe that's for another thread.
- Moose83
- string
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 8:20 pm
Re: Prize eligibilty
Think it's a very fair question especially in small events like this
In other countries, for smaller championships classes are usually combined. Bit like city races in the UK, so children, juniors, seniors, vets1 (40+), vets2 (55+) for example
Not sure why that isn't applied for the Southern Nights. It does make for some pretty small classes in places
In other countries, for smaller championships classes are usually combined. Bit like city races in the UK, so children, juniors, seniors, vets1 (40+), vets2 (55+) for example
Not sure why that isn't applied for the Southern Nights. It does make for some pretty small classes in places
- Arnold
- diehard
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:24 am
Re: Prize eligibilty
Arnold wrote:Not sure why (they don't combine classes)
As NeilC pointed out, its a form-filling competition. If you reduce the number of classes then you'd lose most of the technical difficulty.
Coming soon
Boston City Race (May, maybe not)
Coasts and Islands (Shetland)
SprintScotland https://sprintscotland.weebly.com/
Boston City Race (May, maybe not)
Coasts and Islands (Shetland)
SprintScotland https://sprintscotland.weebly.com/
-
graeme - god
- Posts: 4744
- Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 6:04 pm
- Location: struggling with an pɹɐɔ ʇıɯǝ
Re: Prize eligibilty
Arnold wrote:Not sure why that isn't applied for the Southern Nights. It does make for some pretty small classes in places
Possibly because no one really "owns" the competition. BOF shouldn't be writing the rules for these sorts of regional competitions which means it's up to the constituant associations to do so. There isn't really any mechanism for doing this.
In contrast the association competitions (eg SE Nights) do have rules - and combined age classes.
- NeilC
- addict
- Posts: 1348
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 9:03 am
- Location: SE
Re: Prize eligibilty
I wouldn't worry as Mark Bown will win M21 and Geoff Ellis will be fastest M35 (are RAFO eligible for Southern champs?)
- sloaner
- off string
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 12:15 pm
Re: Prize eligibilty
sloaner wrote:I wouldn't worry as Mark Bown will win M21 and Geoff Ellis will be fastest M35 (are RAFO eligible for Southern champs?)
RAFO Members are affilited to a variety of Associations - Geoff is SCOA and has been on podia at several previous Southern Champs!
hop fat boy, hop!
-
madmike - guru
- Posts: 1703
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 7:36 pm
- Location: Retired in North Yorks
Re: Prize eligibilty
NeilC wrote:The general principle is that a runner is only eligible in the class that they entered. There are good reasons for that ...
There are no good reasons for that.
- keever
- white
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:44 am
- Location: lakes
Re: Prize eligibilty
keever wrote: There are no good reasons for that.
Then put in a motion to the AGM / lobby EC&C to get the principle changed.
- NeilC
- addict
- Posts: 1348
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 9:03 am
- Location: SE
Re: Prize eligibilty
NeilC wrote:keever wrote: There are no good reasons for that.
Then put in a motion to the AGM / lobby EC&C to get the principle changed.
Fighting bureaucracy with bureaucracy. Yay!
Think I'll stick with fell running, where winners win (and losers don't).
- keever
- white
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:44 am
- Location: lakes
Re: Prize eligibilty
keever wrote:NeilC wrote:The general principle is that a runner is only eligible in the class that they entered. There are good reasons for that ...
There are no good reasons for that.
There's plenty of good reasons for that! Otherwise eligibility for prizes comes down to which classes run the same course, which is pointless and arbitrary.
This is one of my bugbears with the set up of orienteering - I know lots of people (usually the best orienteers) disagree but if you are going to have age classes I cannot understand why its OK to pick and choose which "age class" you want to run in - its not an age class then is it? Its confusing and dispiriting for people in the weaker age brackets (eg M35) to get beaten for trophies by people in stronger age categories running up. For me if you dont want to run your own age category, then run open, or run non-comp.

Orienteering - its no walk in the park
- andypat
- god
- Posts: 2856
- Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:58 pm
- Location: Houston, we have a problem.
73 posts
• Page 1 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests