Sheffield City Race 24 Nov 12
Moderators: [nope] cartel, team nopesport
Re: Sheffield City Race 24 Nov 12
M21-Lairy
- ba-ba
- diehard
- Posts: 668
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 10:31 pm
- Location: somewhere in the between
Re: Sheffield City Race 24 Nov 12
Note it's not 600m to assembley from the station, only 60m.
BUOT: Orienteering Opportunities for all students
facebook.com/British.Uni.Orienteering
facebook.com/British.Uni.Orienteering
-
Dave - brown
- Posts: 511
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 10:44 am
Re: Sheffield City Race 24 Nov 12
Martin Ward, SYO (Chair) & SPOOK.
I'm a 1%er. Are you?
I'm a 1%er. Are you?
-
Spookster - god
- Posts: 2267
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 1:49 pm
- Location: Sheffield
Re: Sheffield City Race 24 Nov 12
Dave wrote:Note it's not 600m to assembly from the station, only 60m.
expecting courses of 280m then, based on this trend.
M21-Lairy
- ba-ba
- diehard
- Posts: 668
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 10:31 pm
- Location: somewhere in the between
Re: Sheffield City Race 24 Nov 12
Great event, thanks ShUOC.
A pity that control 40 got Stolen (removed) early on (by the church caretaker of all people - the church manager hadn't told him the event had permission to put a control in the church yard). Also a pity that control 64 caused some controversy by being in a passage way above ground level, which was probably impossible to map "correctly".
But anyway, some great course planning that made the most of the technical challenges I thought, and assembly areas don't come better than that.
Results

A pity that control 40 got Stolen (removed) early on (by the church caretaker of all people - the church manager hadn't told him the event had permission to put a control in the church yard). Also a pity that control 64 caused some controversy by being in a passage way above ground level, which was probably impossible to map "correctly".
But anyway, some great course planning that made the most of the technical challenges I thought, and assembly areas don't come better than that.
Results
Last edited by Spookster on Sun Nov 25, 2012 9:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
Martin Ward, SYO (Chair) & SPOOK.
I'm a 1%er. Are you?
I'm a 1%er. Are you?
-
Spookster - god
- Posts: 2267
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 1:49 pm
- Location: Sheffield
Re: Sheffield City Race 24 Nov 12
Pity several (many?) in the prologue chose to cross the OOB pedestrian crossing by the Crucible rather than use the marked underpass crossing point - maybe the line between controls should have been bent via the crossing point.
- ianandmonika
- red
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 10:03 pm
Re: Sheffield City Race 24 Nov 12
Photo's from final NopeSport race for 2012 + a couple of prize-giving pics 
Sheffield Sprint and Chase

Sheffield Sprint and Chase
- haloite
- red
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 11:01 am
Re: Sheffield City Race 24 Nov 12
Not sure if results meant to be as shown but overall Chase results should be based on overall time inc prologue (that's how a chasing start works), not just on the Chase leg alone - related to the point about following made in a separate Nopesport thread.
- ianandmonika
- red
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 10:03 pm
Re: Sheffield City Race 24 Nov 12
Spookster wrote:Also a pity that control 64 caused some controversy by being in a passage way above ground level, which was probably impossible to map "correctly".
Thinking/talking about it afterwards, it probably could be if there was an easily recognisable symbol/colour for a raised walkway/bridge: whilst there is the underpass symbol, it really doesn't work for where the overpassing section is narrow (e.g. a walkway), or the section underneath is particularly broad. Yes, there's a bridge symbol, but it's virtually impossible to pick out, and isn't practical in many instances. However, if a paved area with an area that passes beneath was mapped with a separate colour (e.g. using paler or darker brown compared to normal paved mapping), then it would be more easily distinguishable. This coupled with a description that allowed 'upper level' or 'lower level' (I don't think the 'top' or 'underneath' symbols apply here) would make it easier to allow multi-level sections.
Just some thoughts.
In the meantime, thanks to ShUOC for a great event, particularly the first half of the prologue, which was as testing as I've found. Enjoyed the chasing sprint too, even if I lost out a bit, with 10 of us within a minute or so of each other. Phew!
-
awk - god
- Posts: 3263
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 5:29 pm
- Location: Bradford
Re: Sheffield City Race 24 Nov 12
What a great event from a technical point of view. Kept you thinking all the time
Well done Jonny.
IanandMonika said:
Pity several (many?) in the prologue chose to cross the OOB pedestrian crossing by the Crucible rather than use the marked underpass crossing point - maybe the line between controls should have been bent via the crossing point.
Why not put a control in the underpass so everyone has to go that way? Simples.
Actually, it was a shame about that as I imagine it skewed the results quite a lot, maybe even the Nopesport league results
Comment/observation: I thought a role of the controller was to ensure the competition was fair for all, so why didn't the controller pick up on the possibility of competitors using pelican crossings? There is so much info to read on final details that it is very hard to remember it all in the heat of a race.

IanandMonika said:
Pity several (many?) in the prologue chose to cross the OOB pedestrian crossing by the Crucible rather than use the marked underpass crossing point - maybe the line between controls should have been bent via the crossing point.
Why not put a control in the underpass so everyone has to go that way? Simples.
Actually, it was a shame about that as I imagine it skewed the results quite a lot, maybe even the Nopesport league results

Comment/observation: I thought a role of the controller was to ensure the competition was fair for all, so why didn't the controller pick up on the possibility of competitors using pelican crossings? There is so much info to read on final details that it is very hard to remember it all in the heat of a race.
- RS
- brown
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 5:47 pm
Re: Sheffield City Race 24 Nov 12
With multilevels, the idea of different colours for different levels could work. I'd thought the same for the Barbican area in London.
The idea of upper (or lower) level indicators being in the descriptions is good - too much guesswork just now. Even where a control was at ground level in the Chase , I was looking for it up steps because that's what happened in the Prologue.
The idea of upper (or lower) level indicators being in the descriptions is good - too much guesswork just now. Even where a control was at ground level in the Chase , I was looking for it up steps because that's what happened in the Prologue.
- ianandmonika
- red
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 10:03 pm
Re: Sheffield City Race 24 Nov 12
RS wrote:Actually, it was a shame about that as I imagine it skewed the results quite a lot, maybe even the Nopesport league results
I watched the road crossing for a while after my run, and about 50% or more used the pelican crossing on the way out on course B and the underpass coming back. In most, if not all, cases, I don't think the former was deliberate - there was a pelican crossing close to one of the underpasses, and I suspect quite a few people used it thinking they were legitimately using the marked crossing.
I also timed a few people, and I don't think it made much difference: nobody raced across the road, most made an effort to go to the pelican crosssing, and their slower speeds compensated for the more positive running of those going under the underpasses, who were also far surer of themselves (after all the road crossers were largely not sure of themselves, as the pelican crossing wasn't quite in the same place as the underpass).
-
awk - god
- Posts: 3263
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 5:29 pm
- Location: Bradford
Re: Sheffield City Race 24 Nov 12
ianandmonika wrote:With multilevels, the idea of different colours for different levels could work.
Always a difficult one, at times you just have to admit that the area is too complex to be mapped on a single sheet (but can choose to use different maps for different levels). Alternatively a bit of creativity with colours is good - in the Barbican we have been allowed to run along the top of a canopy (but also pass underneath it). At Oxford this year a raised walkway was mapped as a darker Brown which again you could run along or under. For Brighton (http://www.brightoncityrace.org.uk/) we have a three level promenade and I've chosen the Oxford approach to map the middle layer. Personally I'd like to see this become the norm rather than use different shades of brown to depict different potential levels of traffic, something which is common on many sprint/urban maps.
- NeilC
- addict
- Posts: 1348
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 9:03 am
- Location: SE
Re: Sheffield City Race 24 Nov 12
ianandmonika wrote:Pity several (many?) in the prologue chose to cross the OOB pedestrian crossing by the Crucible rather than use the marked underpass crossing point - maybe the line between controls should have been bent via the crossing point.
Even greater pity that I was the only one to 'fess up and dq myself at the finish...

-
Strider - light green
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 5:42 pm
- Location: The Flat County
Re: Sheffield City Race 24 Nov 12
How is it that after nearly every urban event we hear stories of people cheating?
Go orienteering in Lithuania......... best in the world:)
Real Name - Gross
http://www.scottishotours.info
Real Name - Gross
http://www.scottishotours.info
-
Gross - god
- Posts: 2699
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 11:13 am
- Location: Heading back to Scotland
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests