Routegadget reproduction
Moderators: [nope] cartel, team nopesport
Re: Routegadget reproduction
Do I take it that the "loose" descriptions and those on the map were different?
Possibly the slowest Orienteer in the NE but maybe above average at 114kg
-
AndyC - addict
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:10 am
- Location: Half my Time here the rest there
Re: Routegadget reproduction
Yes the loose descriptions were written (junior course) the map descriptions were pictorial - to be honest I hadn't even noticed them as they were on a part of the map we didn't go near. The controller apologised handsomely and removed the leg which is all he could realistically do. I was just irritated because as you probably realise these things have a knock on effect which I felt had been ignored in Strider's slightly dismissive
like that meant every thing was fixed. I couldn't trust the next description - as the control down the passage seemed too easy and the circle was pulling me to the other side of the wall.....and maybe if I'd arrived at the busy road before the river crossing earlier I wouldn't have been held up by 30 secs of traffic. Who knows?The troublesome leg on D has been voided by the controller
-
Mrs H - god
- Posts: 2975
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 3:30 pm
Re: Routegadget reproduction
AndyC wrote:Do I take it that the "loose" descriptions and those on the map were different?
Yes, on course D they were pictorial on the map and the planner had then transcribed them into written form for the loose copies, but in doing so made the error of switching 'east side' to 'west side'... oops.
S.
-
Strider - light green
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 5:42 pm
- Location: The Flat County
Re: Routegadget reproduction
Mrs H wrote:I was just irritated because as you probably realise these things have a knock on effect which I felt had been ignored in Strider's slightly dismissivelike that meant every thing was fixed.The troublesome leg on D has been voided by the controller
Please don't be so presumptive to interprete my statement as 'dismissive' when it was nothing of the kind. In this case I was reporting fact, simple as that, and I was not implying that everything 'was fixed' at all.
S.
-
Strider - light green
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 5:42 pm
- Location: The Flat County
Re: Routegadget reproduction
Fair enough - could you give me a pointer on how to interpret the "oops" in the following ?
Strider wrote: but in doing so made the error of switching 'east side' to 'west side'... oops.
-
Mrs H - god
- Posts: 2975
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 3:30 pm
Re: Routegadget reproduction
The circle size between routgadget and the map is very different. (The circle on RG barely goes beyond the path.) This would also mean that the relative width of the wall is greater on routegagdet and I think this makes it easier to place the centre of the circle on one side of the wall on routegadget. However I would also agree that the circle on routegadget is unlikely to be in exactly the same place as it has to be placed by hand.
But as I understand it, there isn't a requirment to have the centre of the circle on the feature, just that the control site is accurately described given where the circle has been placed.
But as I understand it, there isn't a requirment to have the centre of the circle on the feature, just that the control site is accurately described given where the circle has been placed.
- Marco Polo
- light green
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 7:17 pm
- Location: Chilterns
Re: Routegadget reproduction
Marco Polo wrote:However I would also agree that the circle on routegadget is unlikely to be in exactly the same place as it has to be placed by hand.
I think this is the answer to Mrs H's original question - getting the circles lined up in RouteGadget is a bit of an artform, and in this case it is probably just chance that the circle in RG is more obviously offset to the correct side of the wall than the circle on the map.
Marco Polo wrote:But as I understand it, there isn't a requirment to have the centre of the circle on the feature, just that the control site is accurately described given where the circle has been placed.
BOF Rules wrote:5.2.1 All course markings on the map shall be drawn according to the ‘International Specification for Orienteering Maps 2000’ (ISOM 2000), or the ‘International Specification for Sprint Orienteering Maps 2007’ (ISSOM 2007), subject to any specific British Orienteering amendments as described in Appendix B (Course Planning).
BOF Rules Appendix B wrote:3.1.12 The site of each control shall be shown as the centre of a circle of 6mm diameter. ... If the control feature is shown on the map symbolically rather than to scale, the circle should be drawn so that the symbol lies exactly at the centre. For example, this means that if you use the east side of a dot knoll as a control site then the circle should be drawn around the middle of the symbol, not the east side of it. However, a feature such as a knoll shown by a ring contour (i.e. hill) is drawn to scale and the centre of the circle shall be drawn where the control site is (e.g. N side) rather than at the centre of the ring contour.
ISSOM 2007 wrote:702 Control Point
The control points are shown with circles. The centre of the circle shows the precise position of the feature.
Edited to add quote from appendix B
Last edited by Scott on Mon Sep 06, 2010 3:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"If only you were younger and better..."
-
Scott - god
- Posts: 2429
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 4:43 am
- Location: in the queue for the ice-cream van
Re: Routegadget reproduction
Mrs H wrote:Fair enough - could you give me a pointer on how to interpret the "oops" in the following ?Strider wrote: but in doing so made the error of switching 'east side' to 'west side'... oops.
Good Lord...and people wonder why more orienteers don't get involved in debate on Nopesport
-
Strider - light green
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 5:42 pm
- Location: The Flat County
Re: Routegadget reproduction
Can I try for you Strider was "oops" short for "that was an unfortunate error which wasn't spotted (but should have been) which we regret and humbly apologise for"?
Possibly the slowest Orienteer in the NE but maybe above average at 114kg
-
AndyC - addict
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:10 am
- Location: Half my Time here the rest there
Re: Routegadget reproduction
Oh I feel better already 

-
Mrs H - god
- Posts: 2975
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 3:30 pm
Re: Routegadget reproduction
AndyC wrote:Can I try for you Strider was "oops" short for "that was an unfortunate error which wasn't spotted (but should have been) which we regret and humbly apologise for"?
As has been stated by Ranald on the forum here and in his controller's report on the results page..... but obviously we need to keep on grovelling to keep some people happy

S.
-
Strider - light green
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 5:42 pm
- Location: The Flat County
Re: Routegadget reproduction
One thing that comes out of this is that the SOA policy to use pictorial descriptions for ALL courses is much better than using text. "Wall inside SE corner" is UTTERLY unintuitive AND requires knowledge which is east, which way up the map is.
Many orienteers (particularly children do not know which is east and which west.
"SE corner" immediately implies (wrongly in this case) the SE side.
A symbol is not only intuitive but has the added benefit that the angle is the same as that the map is being viewed at regardless of orientation - INFINITELY easier.
Many orienteers (particularly children do not know which is east and which west.
"SE corner" immediately implies (wrongly in this case) the SE side.
A symbol is not only intuitive but has the added benefit that the angle is the same as that the map is being viewed at regardless of orientation - INFINITELY easier.
- EddieH
- god
- Posts: 2513
- Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 4:04 pm
Re: Routegadget reproduction
EddieH wrote:A symbol is not only intuitive but has the added benefit that the angle is the same as that the map is being viewed at regardless of orientation
unless the control description is strapped to your arm...
Andrew Dalgleish (INT)
Views expressed on Nopesport are my own.
Views expressed on Nopesport are my own.
- andy
- god
- Posts: 2455
- Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2003 11:42 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
Re: Routegadget reproduction
Strider wrote: but obviously we need to keep on grovelling to keep some people happy![]()
S.
You really are not getting this are you? Yes control 9 description was incontrovertibly wrong. The controller has apologised handsomely and done what he could. My gripe is with control 10 which I found ambiguous and which I am far from being alone in doing so. Your assertion that I am simply being unreasonable to feel that way is making me want to dig my heels in all the more.

Out of interest - were you actually an official at this event - I'm just interested to know by what authority you state your case as you speak about both the planner and controller in 3rd person.
Last edited by Mrs H on Mon Sep 06, 2010 4:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Mrs H - god
- Posts: 2975
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 3:30 pm
Re: Routegadget reproduction
Scott wrote:Marco Polo wrote:However I would also agree that the circle on routegadget is unlikely to be in exactly the same place as it has to be placed by hand.
I think this is the answer to Mrs H's original question - getting the circles lined up in RouteGadget is a bit of an artform, and in this case it is probably just chance that the circle in RG is more obviously offset to the correct side of the wall than the circle on the map.Marco Polo wrote:But as I understand it, there isn't a requirment to have the centre of the circle on the feature, just that the control site is accurately described given where the circle has been placed.BOF Rules wrote:5.2.1 All course markings on the map shall be drawn according to the ‘International Specification for Orienteering Maps 2000’ (ISOM 2000), or the ‘International Specification for Sprint Orienteering Maps 2007’ (ISSOM 2007), subject to any specific British Orienteering amendments as described in Appendix B (Course Planning).BOF Rules Appendix B wrote:3.1.12 The site of each control shall be shown as the centre of a circle of 6mm diameter. ... If the control feature is shown on the map symbolically rather than to scale, the circle should be drawn so that the symbol lies exactly at the centre. For example, this means that if you use the east side of a dot knoll as a control site then the circle should be drawn around the middle of the symbol, not the east side of it. However, a feature such as a knoll shown by a ring contour (i.e. hill) is drawn to scale and the centre of the circle shall be drawn where the control site is (e.g. N side) rather than at the centre of the ring contour.ISSOM 2007 wrote:702 Control Point
The control points are shown with circles. The centre of the circle shows the precise position of the feature.
Edited to add quote from appendix B
Fair point- reading the rules 'n' all that

In practice i would expect circles to be centred with PC course setting and printing, and as the rest of the thread has indicated, the control description rather than the precise centre of the circle is the issue, especially if the width of the wall is considered to be mapped symbolically.
- Marco Polo
- light green
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 7:17 pm
- Location: Chilterns
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests