The idea that was thrown about a bit last year was to change the format of the event.
7 or 6 legs. The relay starts at Sunset ish on the Saturday night and runs for 3 legs. It then restarts with a chasing start on Sunday at a sensible time, say 10:00 and runs the final 3 or 4 legs. This allows night orienteering without having to stay up all night.
Harvester 2012
Moderators: [nope] cartel, team nopesport
33 posts
• Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Re: Harvester 2012
I quite like that idea as it gives quite a few possibilities.
- As well as the 6/7 man competition you could have separate night relay and day relay competitions... this would suit far away and small clubs who can only raise half a team to enter one of the sub-competitions.
- Hard men and women could opt to run a night leg, then do a day leg for a day leg only team.
- You could use two areas and split the work between two clubs more easily.
- You could use a darker time of the year, maybe October when the calendar isn't too crowded, then start the first night leg earlier, maybe 7pm just as the sun is going down so everyone can run off into the sunset. Day leg competitors can then relax and enjoy the action if there were appropriate facilities... food, beer tent/ pub etc. October isn't too bad for camping.
- Organisers and controllers can get some sleep.
I'm sure this contradicts at least half the published rules for the Harvester, but I get the feeling that the lack of clubs interested in putting on the competition would mean that no-one would object (including whoever is in charge of rules at the moment? ) if someone tried such major innovations and still used the Harvester brand?
The downside would be missing out on that running in the middle of the night/ early dawn feeling, but it is probably time for major innovation now so few clubs seem interested in organising it.
- As well as the 6/7 man competition you could have separate night relay and day relay competitions... this would suit far away and small clubs who can only raise half a team to enter one of the sub-competitions.
- Hard men and women could opt to run a night leg, then do a day leg for a day leg only team.
- You could use two areas and split the work between two clubs more easily.
- You could use a darker time of the year, maybe October when the calendar isn't too crowded, then start the first night leg earlier, maybe 7pm just as the sun is going down so everyone can run off into the sunset. Day leg competitors can then relax and enjoy the action if there were appropriate facilities... food, beer tent/ pub etc. October isn't too bad for camping.
- Organisers and controllers can get some sleep.
I'm sure this contradicts at least half the published rules for the Harvester, but I get the feeling that the lack of clubs interested in putting on the competition would mean that no-one would object (including whoever is in charge of rules at the moment? ) if someone tried such major innovations and still used the Harvester brand?
The downside would be missing out on that running in the middle of the night/ early dawn feeling, but it is probably time for major innovation now so few clubs seem interested in organising it.
- SeanC
- god
- Posts: 2292
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 6:46 pm
- Location: Kent
Re: Harvester 2012
I don't really see that there is a great deal wrong with the format of the Harvester as it currently stands. Will tinkering with the format really result in more teams turning up? I doubt it.
I don't think that holding it in the South has had that great an impact on the number of clubs attending; it just means that some of the southern clubs who probably wouldn't have travelled north are attending and vice versa. The main reasons for the number of clubs being down this year are probably:
1. It clashes with WMOC.
2. The late allocation of a club to take it on.
The only way to overcome both of these issues is for a long term programme to be put in place with club's agreeing to take the task on and getting it advertised a long time in advance. BAOC agreed to take the event on this year when it was becoming apparent that it may not actually happen; which in my mind is a sad state of affairs.
I don't think that holding it in the South has had that great an impact on the number of clubs attending; it just means that some of the southern clubs who probably wouldn't have travelled north are attending and vice versa. The main reasons for the number of clubs being down this year are probably:
1. It clashes with WMOC.
2. The late allocation of a club to take it on.
The only way to overcome both of these issues is for a long term programme to be put in place with club's agreeing to take the task on and getting it advertised a long time in advance. BAOC agreed to take the event on this year when it was becoming apparent that it may not actually happen; which in my mind is a sad state of affairs.
- Soldja Boi
- off string
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:07 pm
Re: Harvester 2012
I can't get excited about splitting the relay into two parts. The relatively low entry could just be part of a general trend that many of us are seeing of club members not being particularly interested in travelling when there are so many local events on offer, and when budgets are tight.
If the lack of night orienteers is found to be a real problem for clubs then one option could be start the race later in the night such that only the first couple of laps would be in the dark. This also means that there is more chance of some sleep beforehand. This format works quite well for the Peter Palmer relay held in September.
Many thanks to BAOC for once again rescuing one of these events, bring on next Sunday.
If the lack of night orienteers is found to be a real problem for clubs then one option could be start the race later in the night such that only the first couple of laps would be in the dark. This also means that there is more chance of some sleep beforehand. This format works quite well for the Peter Palmer relay held in September.
Many thanks to BAOC for once again rescuing one of these events, bring on next Sunday.
- NeilC
- addict
- Posts: 1348
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 9:03 am
- Location: SE
-
Deaf Old Gorilla - off string
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 4:02 pm
- Location: Howling in the forest
Re: Harvester 2012
Thanks for the event. Good to do a bit better than at the sothern nights.
-
ifor - brown
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2003 6:48 pm
- Location: Bristol
Re: Harvester 2012
Winners are:
Men's Premier - FVO
Small Club - SLOW
A course handicap - SO
Women's Premier - SYO
Women's Handicap - SLOW
Junior - SO
B course handicap - BAOC
Congratulations to all winning teams.
Men's Premier - FVO
Small Club - SLOW
A course handicap - SO
Women's Premier - SYO
Women's Handicap - SLOW
Junior - SO
B course handicap - BAOC
Congratulations to all winning teams.
- Soldja Boi
- off string
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:07 pm
Re: Harvester 2012
Amazing effort by BAOC running the event with an absolute skeleton staff - well I bet they felt like skeletons afterwards
really tough long courses - I'm relieved to have drawn the day leg this year and I enjoyed that very much even though it took me forever. interesting, varied area and my goodness we were all very lucky with the weather 


-
Mrs H - god
- Posts: 2975
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 3:30 pm
Re: Harvester 2012
Really good event from BAOC. On the participation point I really don't think the WMOC can be blamed for a decline of so many teams, it's simply because clubs cannot be bothered to enter! Most could field at least 1 if not 2 teams for the A but they aren't interested.
With regards to changing the format, splitting the relay in half, this is already a successful concept in Sweden with the Stigtomtakalven relay (what most clubs use as a Tiomila warm-up). It doesn't take away from the excitement if the commentary is good and if you're up for it, so I can't see that as a reason against it, as it would also make travel a lot easier if you don't have people who can get down for the early legs they can come the next day. However if more clubs came they'd be no need to change the format, so lets just get more entries!
With regards to changing the format, splitting the relay in half, this is already a successful concept in Sweden with the Stigtomtakalven relay (what most clubs use as a Tiomila warm-up). It doesn't take away from the excitement if the commentary is good and if you're up for it, so I can't see that as a reason against it, as it would also make travel a lot easier if you don't have people who can get down for the early legs they can come the next day. However if more clubs came they'd be no need to change the format, so lets just get more entries!
- WillG
- off string
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2012 10:22 am
Re: Harvester 2012
The issue I see with changing the format is that the best part of it is the fact that it's continuous and runs through the night, letting those who wish to, to follow it through, seeing the changing of psoitions as the race progresses until the culmination of the results at the end.
Main issue is the same as for most fo the footpath relays etc, people have plenty of options for other events to attend and clubs need to become proactive in recruiting teams, approaching individuals and asking them to run for their clubs team rather than just sending an email asking if anyone wants to do it. Club captains/chairmen need to take an active interest in these club events and encourage participation in what ultimately helps to bind a club together and make it stronger.
The only other option i can see is that entries are opened to 'teams' so groups of friends can enter rather than relying on their clubs to heve enough interest. The amount of people that I've heard say I wanted to do it but no-one else in the club wanted to do it shows there's interest and this may add a few teams to the mix.
Main issue is the same as for most fo the footpath relays etc, people have plenty of options for other events to attend and clubs need to become proactive in recruiting teams, approaching individuals and asking them to run for their clubs team rather than just sending an email asking if anyone wants to do it. Club captains/chairmen need to take an active interest in these club events and encourage participation in what ultimately helps to bind a club together and make it stronger.
The only other option i can see is that entries are opened to 'teams' so groups of friends can enter rather than relying on their clubs to heve enough interest. The amount of people that I've heard say I wanted to do it but no-one else in the club wanted to do it shows there's interest and this may add a few teams to the mix.
Punter Elite
- FRBlackSheep
- off string
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:44 pm
Re: Harvester 2012
SLOW a small club. I find that hard to believe. Not taking anything away from their team who did very well.
- Tatty
- guru
- Posts: 1626
- Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 7:21 pm
Re: Harvester 2012
For the Harvester a small club is defined by the results in the last few years. As SLOW have not finished near the top recently they qualified for this competition.
-
Simon - brown
- Posts: 532
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 7:40 pm
- Location: here or there
Re: Harvester 2012
* Small Club Classification (Sutton Park Trophy) – The Sutton Park Trophy is awarded to the first ‘small club’ competing on the A course of the Harvester. For the Harvester, a club is defined as ‘small’ if it has not finished in the top three positions at any time in the previous five years.
Punter Elite
- FRBlackSheep
- off string
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:44 pm
Re: Harvester 2012
Thank you. Strange definition of small 

- Tatty
- guru
- Posts: 1626
- Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 7:21 pm
Re: Harvester 2012
Perhaps a better title would be not very successful in the last 5 years but now come good trophy....
Last edited by FRBlackSheep on Mon Jul 02, 2012 4:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Punter Elite
- FRBlackSheep
- off string
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:44 pm
33 posts
• Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests