Nopesport

by **J.Tullster** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:29 am

This is the chance for everyone to have their say. Go on, vote. Your vote can make a difference.

by **pyrat** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:40 am

No way, he provides loads of entertainment around here. That strain morph was hilarious, and all the sick stuff may be sick but at least it produces some intense feelings. adds some drama... im not too keen on his paparazzi element or drunken chat tho, but noones perfect.

by **PeterG** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:57 am

Wheres the "I love PeterG and I want to have his babies" option? :cry:

by **bendover** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 3:29 am

stay. the vote doesn't merit a vote.

/\
/ \

i wrote that before. then i just followed his link from the 'hasselhof' discussion. sorry peter but that was a f***ing idiot thing to link to and it pissed me right off. although this forum carries a warning about bad language etc. posting a link to jobby like that is just totally dumb.

think twice before you post - nope members from the junior forums will browse the banter site, as will people browsing in public areas - uni labs, internet cafes; even at home in front of their own kids. its not funny.

by **samsonite** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:14 pm

i love u peter.

but i have to say that right now.

by **LostAgain** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 1:57 pm

It's certainly in bad taste, a banning offence?

We'd miss his humour and since when was taste a pre-requisite?

by **J.Tullster** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 5:04 pm

Aye, maybe banning Peter is a bit daft, I was just a tiny little bit pissed off at the time. Still, it's surprising the number of people that voted!

by **Mrs H.** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 5:13 pm

I'd like to thank J. Tullster for his no-nonsense warning which i had no doubts about heeding. Curiosity would probably have got the better of me otherwise- i don't want to know what was on the site but my delicate sensibilities would almost certainly have been offended - and worse than that Mr H. would have banned me from nope if something nasty had happened to his new machine :cry:

but general Peter has given us some good laughs with his pictures and his genital obsession :oops:

by **LostAgain** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 5:37 pm

J.Tullster wrote:Still, it's surprising the number of people that voted!

Does the poll prevent multiple voting or is each registered person on Nope restricted to 1 vote?

If restricted to 1 vote this could be a powerful tool for gauging opinion!

by **brooner** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 6:17 pm

yup, you can only vote once and guests cannot vote.

by **richardm** » Thu Jan 20, 2005 6:34 pm

bendover wrote:i wrote that before. then i just followed his link from the 'hasselhof' discussion. sorry peter but that was a f***ing idiot thing to link to and it pissed me right off. although this forum carries a warning about bad language etc. posting a link to jobby like that is just totally dumb.

think twice before you post - nope members from the junior forums will browse the banter site, as will people browsing in public areas - uni labs, internet cafes; even at home in front of their own kids. its not funny.

it was a bit sick, but it was in the banter section. il jus check if hes replied anything nasty/unwanted after anything ive sed an then place my vote :wink: