Draft new ISOM specification now published
Moderators: [nope] cartel, team nopesport
34 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Re: Draft new ISOM specification now published
No-one has mentioned the numerous high fences which can either be scrambled through or underneath.
- EddieH
- god
- Posts: 2513
- Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 4:04 pm
Re: Draft new ISOM specification now published
EddieH wrote:No-one has mentioned the numerous high fences which can either be scrambled through or underneath.
greywolf wrote:if it's a broken deer fence you use the broken fence symbol regardless of how high it is/was
-
greywolf - addict
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 12:45 pm
- Location: far far away
Re: Draft new ISOM specification now published
One possibility would be to use symbols which indicate whether crossing is prohibited and hight independently. For example:
- Thin line: crossing permitted
- Thick line: crossing prohibited
- Single tags: low
- Double tags: high
This should avoid the problem of how to represent high fences which are permitted to be crossed (but not the potential need to update the map according to permissions).
- Thin line: crossing permitted
- Thick line: crossing prohibited
- Single tags: low
- Double tags: high
This should avoid the problem of how to represent high fences which are permitted to be crossed (but not the potential need to update the map according to permissions).
- dch
- off string
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 12:12 am
Re: Draft new ISOM specification now published
greywolf wrote:[
True, but I'm unconvinced there are that many land-managers who would be completely blase about unrestricted deer-fence climbing - a skinny W21E might be ok but 114kg of AndyC is going to do some serious damage if he just climbs up the wire at a stob![]()
:
Can I just make it clear that I have no intention of climbing any deer fences - especially as if I tried there is likely to be very easy route for competitors afterwards!
However at Talkin Tarn on Saturday I had to maintain discipline about the fences which were indicated in the CD's as not to be crossed and I'm sure that at one point I could have saved 300m by stepping over one with relative ease. But the planner had bent the line through the crossing point and it was clear that fences were not to be crossed anywhere ( I even ran along a path which had a low one across it and ran around rather than potentially annoy the landowner) so it was the same for all.
Possibly the slowest Orienteer in the NE but maybe above average at 114kg
-
AndyC - addict
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:10 am
- Location: Half my Time here the rest there
34 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Jon X and 17 guests