graeme wrote:[One of the big attractions seems to be the consistently high quality of the fields at these races.
Personally I will never add much to the quality of these fields.


Moderators: [nope] cartel, team nopesport
graeme wrote:[One of the big attractions seems to be the consistently high quality of the fields at these races.
seabird wrote:Personally I will never add much to the quality of these fields.That's maybe why I favour attracting more local competitors to more local events.
I can assure you they did (my OH is on the club committee). They felt, I gather, that the event was well enough established and saw that it had increased in size last year even with the clash.Steve wrote:I'm surprised the Claro organisers decided to go ahead with the clashing date because they have apparently gone to the trouble and expense of getting the map produced professionally, and presumably need to optimise income to recover costs.
Your word "interference" is surprising. Is the BOF organisation really so much of an administrative / beaurocratic monster that it's worthwhile putting on events randomly, for a relatively small audience, but still risking clashes?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests