distracted wrote:Is this bad "education" of course planning/controlling techniques, or people thinking it's OK because they've had that sort of experience in the past? Shouldn't we be trying to make things as fair and enjoyable as possible, whatever the level of event?
Have you been reading my controller's e-mails to the planner of the event that you're staging in the near future?
"You need to map those thickets, because they're now the same size as the ones that are on the map."
"That control must go on the lip of the pit, because putting in the bottom would make it unfair."
And a little less recently, "Either we cancel the event or we map the bracken" (score event scheduled for October).
Ensuring that the controls go in the right place is only part of the controller's job. One of the strengths of orienteering is that the event officials are mostly also current competitors; the bad experiences that we've had when competing will surely have reinforced our determination to avoid such experiences in events that we're planning, controlling, organising or even merely helping at. Start officials separating maps is a good example.
I'd argue the opposite of your point: people think that it's not OK because they've had that sort of experience in the past.